|
|
Post by Defender_16 on Mar 8, 2004 11:26:42 GMT -5
www.topwebcomics.com/ Topwebcomics has Twokinds designated as R rated. I just noticed that today while I was voting. I was thinking something along the lines of PG-13 would be a better fit. I mean it's not like you see anything, the most in the way of anthing really Romantic was Flora's Dream, and there isnt much in the way of blood. Oh well just thought i'd rant a bit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blind on Mar 8, 2004 11:47:48 GMT -5
And besides the fact that flora is always naked  |
|
|
|
Post by chibi on Mar 8, 2004 16:48:56 GMT -5
what are you talking about? I just went there and they have it listed as PG-13.
|
|
|
|
Post by Defender_16 on Mar 8, 2004 19:25:58 GMT -5
Ok now it says PG-13, it did say R earlier. "And besides the fact that flora is always naked "-Blind Well she has fur ya'know so you dont see anyting.  |
|
|
|
Post by Defender_16 on Mar 17, 2004 21:48:34 GMT -5
They just changed it to 'R' again. Must be because of the content of todays comic. |
|
|
|
Post by gobleteer on Mar 19, 2004 20:42:39 GMT -5
It's PG-13 now. You DO know it's the one under the comic, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fox on Mar 20, 2004 2:29:38 GMT -5
OMG naked people in the water during Hiatus! Rar!
Yeah, that's all I had to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by Craig on Mar 20, 2004 12:22:08 GMT -5
It's just like a dog or cat being naked...Except that she can think rationally and stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fox on Mar 20, 2004 22:56:07 GMT -5
And she has a humanoid form. I mean come on...when the heck do you see a dog with breasts? At least in the sense of a human.  |
|
|
|
Post by Defender_16 on Mar 21, 2004 20:58:44 GMT -5
I really dont know where to stand on this issue anymore. yes there's some "almost nudity" in places......... but i still dont know wheather to count the scenes where Flora isn't wearing any clothes as nudity or not. |
|
|
|
Post by Moogle on Mar 22, 2004 21:55:50 GMT -5
Heh.... yeah. tough topic...
I definately see it as PG-13 tho....
|
|
|
|
Post by mwalimu on Mar 23, 2004 13:03:54 GMT -5
There are some who find the idea of a romance between a human and an animal-morph (in this case, a Keidran) disturbing, a taboo theme that would justify a higher rating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Defender_16 on Mar 24, 2004 17:53:04 GMT -5
I had an idea, what if we try it this way. Ok, say if Keidran never wore clothes would it still be counted as nudity? Another thing i thought of; If a woman were to wear a modernday T-shirt in the Victorian Era people of that time would think of something like that as almost being nudity. |
|
Linden
Keidran Wanderer
I am the one person that i cant make sense of
Posts: 25
|
Post by Linden on Mar 25, 2004 0:39:56 GMT -5
You know about what that one guy said earlier, ive never seen a cat or dog that looked as atractive as flora does.  |
|
|
|
Post by gobleteer on Mar 26, 2004 6:54:02 GMT -5
No, if the woman didn't wear shoes it would be almost nudity! The t-shirt WOULD be. |
|
