|
Post by Id on Jun 4, 2004 18:38:48 GMT -5
I just finished watching Starship Troopers 2, and I must say that it is PURE CRAP.
In my opinion the movie was the perfect example of why there should never be sequels. Bah, I could make a better movie that that in half the time...with more blood and slaughter, too.
...Stupid bugs, an army of them got wiped out by an electric fence...why keep going at something that can easly kill you?
...and the plot was horrible...may I give some away?...there is a new type of bug that infects people...but that's all because some of you might want to see it.
|
|
theodorus
Keidran Merchant
um...yeah...anyways
Posts: 73
|
Post by theodorus on Jun 9, 2004 16:18:03 GMT -5
most likely never will see it
and i knew it would be a bad sequile just becuase it went straight to video
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 14, 2004 13:25:40 GMT -5
To bed I realy liked the first movie.
|
|
|
Post by Id on Jun 14, 2004 19:01:23 GMT -5
Yeah, I did too...and the book, although I don't remember much.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 15, 2004 12:18:33 GMT -5
Books? !! ?? !! ?? There are books of that movie?
|
|
theodorus
Keidran Merchant
um...yeah...anyways
Posts: 73
|
Post by theodorus on Jun 16, 2004 18:17:40 GMT -5
Books? !! ?? !! ??There are books of that movie? That actually makes sense .It is too wierd of a movie to not be based on a book or have a book based on it .
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 17, 2004 3:10:37 GMT -5
Well not al weird films are based on a book.
|
|
|
Post by Id on Jun 17, 2004 12:38:29 GMT -5
Yes, the book was by Robert A. Hienline (sp? I don't have a book around and Google hates me, so no luck. BAD GOOGLE, BAD), and the movie was based on the book, I think...
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 17, 2004 13:13:34 GMT -5
Thanks for the infi id now maybe I can find the book.
|
|
theodorus
Keidran Merchant
um...yeah...anyways
Posts: 73
|
Post by theodorus on Jun 17, 2004 17:59:40 GMT -5
Well not al weird films are based on a book. i am sure it is just that most i that i have seen usually are
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 18, 2004 7:28:30 GMT -5
jeah jore richt moost are. (Yeah you're right most are.)
[Def_16: Man I can even SEE the Dutch accent here. ;D]
|
|
|
Post by Id on Jun 18, 2004 17:53:44 GMT -5
ACK NOT EVEN I'M THIS BAD PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF THE GOD OF SPELLING BADLY TRANSLATE THIS
OH god it burns IT BURNS
...right well if we do this...
there I think thats abit more readable
EDIT: aw crud...if you are dyslexic then.........I take back the first sentince of my last raniting non rant post
....Thats it I'm leaveing the modifying stuff to blind, tom, defender-16, and maybe gob.
[Def_16: Thanks and try not to double post it sets a bad example.]
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 19, 2004 6:41:27 GMT -5
Wel you culden't now. But thanks for the Apologie id. But you're richt my grammer is KRAP.
|
|
|
Post by Id on Jun 19, 2004 20:19:30 GMT -5
there is only one real pet peve that I have and that is invorrect capatilson on a persons name...that and not useing the ' thing....ITS SO CONFUSEING WHEN PEOPLE SAY "id like that" insted of "i'd like that" or calling me"id" and not "Id"
MY RANT IS OVER
BEGONE FOOLS FOR NOW I...I...I...uh...I SLEEP YES THATS IT SLEEP
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 20, 2004 4:22:26 GMT -5
Uuuuh Oke what was that? I diden't realy now what you sayd but it kinda makes sens Id. I think.
|
|