|
|
Post by mwalimu on Sept 27, 2004 15:33:08 GMT -5
Did anyone else find the absence of certain details from the picture of Flora cleaning herself rather conspicuous?
I'm not suggesting they should have been included, rather that perhaps she should have been drawn in a pose where they weren't visible, or at least not as noticeable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sage on Sept 27, 2004 16:31:20 GMT -5
Did anyone else find the absence of certain details from the picture of Flora cleaning herself rather conspicuous? I'm not suggesting they should have been included, rather that perhaps she should have been drawn in a pose where they weren't visible, or at least not as noticeable. well considering the rating its to be expected that Tom wouldnt draw that ^_^ Anyways when drawing comics its nice to try all sorts of poses instead of the same thing over and over again. I think Tom just wanted to draw something to show her to act more cat-like and i'd say that definately did the trick ^_^ |
|
|
|
Post by Rai the Cheetah on Sept 27, 2004 16:55:18 GMT -5
I agree with sage. I think he just wanted to do a different pose as well as make her seem feline. I don't think the presence of correct antomy would of changed anything except the fact it changes the rating of the comic and makes it more preverse rather than giving the presence of a cat like mind. His intent was to make her look catlike and distinguish that fact, not show off anatomy. Plus i think she looks cute like that more than anything  |
|
|
|
Post by Lardmaster on Sept 27, 2004 17:27:11 GMT -5
Well, cmon, how important are those "naughty bits" to the story ? Really. Also remember that an integral part of the comic is the tension present between the two species cultures. The implied nudity is aprt of what makes Tom so uneasy, and the reactions so unbearably cute.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Sept 28, 2004 10:04:09 GMT -5
I agree.
besides if he would draw that as well the comic would lose it's cute ness.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwalimu on Sept 28, 2004 18:31:46 GMT -5
Just to be clear, I wasn't saying the naughty bits should have been drawn, merely pointing out that in that particular pose it was hard not to notice that they were missing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rai the Cheetah on Sept 28, 2004 18:34:07 GMT -5
this was sooo sept 24th ago... lol j/p
|
|
|
|
Post by Fox on Sept 28, 2004 18:37:18 GMT -5
Just to be clear, I wasn't saying the naughty bits should have been drawn, merely pointing out that in that particular pose it was hard not to notice that they were missing. Yeah I noticed, but knew what sort of content Tom was going for. But yes, it's sort of like "Where'd it go" to put it nicely |
|
|
|
Post by Lardmaster on Sept 28, 2004 18:44:42 GMT -5
Maybe shes just got "conveniently placed fur" going on ;p
Cmon, shes gone around nude many times without showing anything. Maybe thats jsut the way keidrans are. Thats the way it works. Its established. And its cute. Nuff said.
|
|
