Photo Woes

seigfox
Keidran Overmind

Teh Cute...

Posts: 275

Photo Woes Sept 27, 2004 5:36:16 GMT -5

Quote

Post by seigfox on Sept 27, 2004 5:36:16 GMT -5

I suppose this had to do with art, so...

Have you ever tried to get online photos from a brand name photography site? It's almost 300 dollars for a good high res picture of anything...

Stupid impossible photo prices...

Some of these pictures arent even good...

I hate how expensive art is...

Man, there sure are alot of "fox" people showing up lately. But I'm still the best.

HIS NAME IS STEVE!!!

"I know we don't call as much as we should, or aren't as well behaved as our goody two shoes brother, Canada. Who I should mention has never had a girlfriend... I'm just saying." - Homer

Raven Keidran Overmind Keidran Post Mage Things aren?t always what they seem Posts: 1,076	Photo Woes Sept 27, 2004 7:43:08 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Raven on Sept 27, 2004 7:43:08 GMT -5 Who that dosen't sound richt, 300 fore an photo? what do they think we are crazy?
	If live is but a dream, then why do we dream about live?

Fox Keidran Overmind Keidran Berserker What's this space for? Posts: 495	Photo Woes Sept 27, 2004 19:32:03 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Fox on Sept 27, 2004 19:32:03 GMT -5 There's people that sell high res. 3D models for prices like that. Of course there's also $9 stuff, but it ranges.
	I always thought this was weird: The line below is true. The line above is false.

rokkun Keidran Wanderer So Bored... Posts: 45	Photo Woes Sept 27, 2004 23:48:43 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by rokkun on Sept 27, 2004 23:48:43 GMT -5 supply and demand, my friend... Obviously there is SOMEONE out there willing to pay 300 big ones for a picture.

Post by seigfox on Sept 27, 2004 5:36:16 GMT -5

Post by Raven on Sept 27, 2004 7:43:08 GMT -5

Post by Fox on Sept 27, 2004 19:32:03 GMT -5

Post by rokkun on Sept 27, 2004 23:48:43 GMT -5

Quick Reply